Problem solving ability to deal with all routine and complex matters of current position. Second I write a summary of the paper in my own words it is useful for the editor to get an objective summary of the paper and the authors can make sure I was on the same page as them. Authors a liation and e-mail. Your report will be evaluated on its thoughtfulness clarity and helpfulness. We found a rough consensus that referees for top journals in economics tend to make similar correct-able. Review the Journal of Political EconomyQuarterly Journal of Economics the Economet-rica the Review of Economic Studies and the Journal of Financial Economics and asked them for their thoughts about what might improve the process. First I print out a physical copy of the paper and read it highlightingunderlining and making notes in the margins or on a piece of paper. Kates Grade Point Average in her first year is very good 500 and she has achieved Distinction 75 to 85 grades along with the majority of Credits 65 to 74 that she obtained in her first semester with us. The paper was subsequently published in the Journal of Health Economics but the bad taste of receiving that report lingered long afterwards So almost five years later when I was writing my first referee report of 2018 I decided to sign my review. Be unnecessarily harsh or unpolite.
Harvey and David Hirshleifer. So the objective of a good referee report is to very briefly state whether and why the contribution is worthwhile or not to be published. Pretend the paper has been submitted to the Journal of International Economics. Previous Referee Reports October 2015 1 AER Referee Reports submitted December 2014 Note. 2 The first stepIdentifyaninterestingspecificeconomic question. Your criticism should be constructive in tone. Summary Write a short summary of the paper using your own words. What is the modeling strategy. 1 Go step by stepAswithalllargeprojectsaresearchpaperis much more manageable when broken down into smaller tasks. Be unnecessarily harsh or unpolite.
I the qualityappropriateness of the methodologies and techniques used in the research ii the quality of the logical arguments made to arrive at the key conclusions of the paper iii the clarity of the presentation. What is the modeling strategy. We found a rough consensus that referees for top journals in economics tend to make similar correctable mistakes. We found a rough consensus that referees for top journals in economics tend to make similar correct-able. The aim is not to build to a conclusion but to start with the conclusion and then justify it with increasing granularity. My paper has clearly improved substantially due to the comments I have received hallmarks of good referee reports. Authors a liation and e-mail. Second I write a summary of the paper in my own words it is useful for the editor to get an objective summary of the paper and the authors can make sure I was on the same page as them. Report should be between 2 or 3 pages of typed text 12 pt font and 15 line spacing. Is it a good t for the journal to which it was submitted.
What data is used. Second I write a summary of the paper in my own words it is useful for the editor to get an objective summary of the paper and the authors can make sure I was on the same page as them. Is it a good t for the journal to which it was submitted. Do NOT spend time writing a review or a summary of the article. Journal of Economic Perspective. Author to write a different paper altogether. Be unnecessarily harsh or unpolite. We found a rough consensus that referees for top journals in economics tend to make similar correct-able. Refer to outcomes delivered eg. We found a rough consensus that referees for top journals in economics tend to make similar correctable mistakes.
Author to write a different paper altogether. Be unnecessarily harsh or unpolite. Give reasons for level of performance eg. Refer to outcomes delivered eg. Summary Reminders for Next Week How to Write an Economics Research Paper To write an economics research paper. In other words give the. Write a 2-3 page referee report summarizing the contribution of the paper its key weaknesses and how these problems might be addressed portions of the paper that might be shortened etc. Problem solving ability to deal with all routine and complex matters of current position. The review process for academic journals in econ. Summary Write a short summary of the paper using your own words.